Feb

3

Muslims to Billy - Nice Picture but now we kill you

February 3, 2006 |

The true face of radical Muslims is seen in this picture. For more you will want to see Conservative California, Michelle Malkin and Outside the Beltway. All this turmoil is fostered by a false sense of religious zeal not to protect God but their own ideal of religious zeal. The insecurity of the radicals is uncovered by a simple drawing.

Now the United States is calling the Muhammad drawings ‘offensive’. To whom? The radicals who are willing to behead, kill, bomb and torture anyone who crosses their sensibilities? What about denouncing the ‘offensive’ behavior and slogans the write on signs. It is like watching children throw a tantrum when they don’t get their way. These cartoons for the most part don’t advocate any similar behavior by anyone else.

“Whoever defames our prophet should be executed,” said Ismail Hassan, 37, a tailor who marched through the pouring rain along with hundreds of others in the West Bank city of Ramallah.

Where were such statements when the NEA used public money for putting a cross in a glass of urine and then calling it art. If you are going to allow ‘freedom’ of speech regardless of whether you agree with the content of message then the United States needs to stand up for the rights to political and religious speech. Why give ground to a group who wants freedom to express themselves while enslaving the world with their ‘religion’.

What about Billy? There is a great cartoon dealing with this issue which is a must see. The article is also worth the read at the Brussels Journal.

Other Blogs: Captain’s Quarters

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis

Comments

2 Comments so far

  1. Conservative Culture » The Religion of Cain - Radical Jihadists on February 6, 2006 10:58 am

    [...] My last two articles, First the Muslims came for the Cartoonists and Muslims to Billy - Nice Picture but now we kill you expressed the how vulnerable their position really is if they can be so threatened by a piece of paper. Steps to quell the violence by ’sacking’ editors and offering apologies seems to provide no release from the growing pressure. [...]

  2. John Dennis on February 6, 2006 10:34 pm

    I agree with freedom of speech even it offends to othe people. You can be disagreed with other by discussion or to the court but not threaten othe people above the law

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind