Nov
2
Kerry & Strickland: What you see isn’t what you get
November 2, 2006 |
(Photo credit: World Net Daily)
Strickland is for guns but doesn’t own a gun. He is for religion but only privately. He is for family values but has failed to vote the values that mirror the talk. For example:
Strickland has just scored 0 percent on the Family Research Council’s 109th Congress Scorecard, meaning that the congressman failed to support any of the legislative measures FRC considered essential to its pro-faith, pro-family agenda.
Typically, Strickland was absent in the voting on three of the seven pieces of legislation FRC scored. On all four of the bills where Strickland did vote, he voted in what FRC would consider a completely anti-faith, anti-family manner.
I really hate to have to say this but there doesn’t appear to be anything authentic about either one of these men. It’s like saying you are for troops before you call them idiots and then spin it that you weren’t talking about them but just their commander-in-chief. No one needs a clear reminder about the “I was for the war before I was against it” routine.
If Ohio can’t figure out that Kerry and Strickland are one and the same then it will be their goose that’s cooked… and not Kerry and Strickland’s.
Who really shot that goose anyway. Probably a secret service agent. They were the only ones in the area who know how to handle a gun.
Comments
1 Comment so far








[...] Conservative Culture reports on Ted Strickland’s family-values rating by the Family Research Council. The Reverend Strickland’s numerical grade is big, fat, and round. [...]